tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12320924.post5183215565585704052..comments2008-05-06T14:01:32.746-10:00Vraxxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14114507483314084325noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12320924.post-15355525193518330342008-05-06T14:01:00.000-10:002008-05-06T14:01:00.000-10:00Yeah i can see what you're saying. I should have phrased it as if GT were true to its ideals (True Racing Simulation). In that regard I agree Prologue falls flat. <BR/><BR/>As for wall hugging to win, no you're actually not right in that regard. Making ontact with a wall will actually cause drag and the car will slow down. However, creative road-hacks have used the "ping pong" reactionary physics to bounce off corners. However I would note the exact same behavior is found in Forza racers who set damage to only being moderate and ping pong through tracks like NYC.Vraxxhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14114507483314084325noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12320924.post-78560590375463751882008-04-17T09:20:00.000-10:002008-04-17T09:20:00.000-10:00"...lack of tuning and damage physics give you that slightly less than true GT feel and gives an edge to the likes of Forza"<BR/><BR/>Doesn't not having damage physics give it a very strong GT feel since none of the GT games have had it?<BR/>Doesn't it also ruin the game if you can win by wall hugging instead of really driving?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com